<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost &#8211; &#8216;The Economist&#8217; &#8211; 4.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/</link>
	<description>What Goes On In Your Ed?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>Hrmph... so, I was right and then I was wrong and I am right again? I is confused...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrmph&#8230; so, I was right and then I was wrong and I am right again? I is confused&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>Stacy and AS are correct. That episode ended with Sun looking conflicted. She was relieved that the baby was Jin&#039;s but she also just received a death sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacy and AS are correct. That episode ended with Sun looking conflicted. She was relieved that the baby was Jin&#8217;s but she also just received a death sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunt Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunt Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>Stacy is right, Juliette confirmed the timing of the baby&#039;s conception to the time on the island. Unless, she didn&#039;t mean it because she was really one of The Others back then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacy is right, Juliette confirmed the timing of the baby&#8217;s conception to the time on the island. Unless, she didn&#8217;t mean it because she was really one of The Others back then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>Wait, wasn&#039;t that answered last season?  It is Jin&#039;s  baby.  The problem on the island is when a woman gets pregnant on the island she doesn&#039;t survive.  Last season Juliette took Sun to have an ultrasound and it said she would have gotten el prego on the island....right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, wasn&#8217;t that answered last season?  It is Jin&#8217;s  baby.  The problem on the island is when a woman gets pregnant on the island she doesn&#8217;t survive.  Last season Juliette took Sun to have an ultrasound and it said she would have gotten el prego on the island&#8230;.right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>Ah, okay then... Sun is in the clear, right? Everyone agrees that it isn&#039;t Jin&#039;s kid unless it was island mojo... which, this would be the first case of if it were. Nope, it is that poor sap who face planted on Jin&#039;s car...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, okay then&#8230; Sun is in the clear, right? Everyone agrees that it isn&#8217;t Jin&#8217;s kid unless it was island mojo&#8230; which, this would be the first case of if it were. Nope, it is that poor sap who face planted on Jin&#8217;s car&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>@Sean - I just re-read your question on Claire doing fine with her birth. I think the issue is that you can&#039;t get pregnant on the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean &#8211; I just re-read your question on Claire doing fine with her birth. I think the issue is that you can&#8217;t get pregnant on the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunt Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2659</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunt Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2659</guid>
		<description>I had put Juliette in my original Oceanic 6, but that was before I knew that THEY would know who was on the manifest, so drop her...So I am going with the conventional thinking the other 2 are Sawyer and Locke-in-the-box, who maybe Sayid whacked because he was on the list. Although I am still tempted to put Sun in there, but it would be reasoned that she would make the NEXT trip in the helicopter. 

And Jack is right...they have to go back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had put Juliette in my original Oceanic 6, but that was before I knew that THEY would know who was on the manifest, so drop her&#8230;So I am going with the conventional thinking the other 2 are Sawyer and Locke-in-the-box, who maybe Sayid whacked because he was on the list. Although I am still tempted to put Sun in there, but it would be reasoned that she would make the NEXT trip in the helicopter. </p>
<p>And Jack is right&#8230;they have to go back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>Sean, I agree that it was strange that Charlotte didn&#039;t mention the spy. I assume she (or Locke) told Syaid about it and Sayid had said it would be best if he could get to the boat and see what they are up to. Maybe she didn&#039;t want lapidus to know too much. It&#039;s funny how only Miles seems hell bent on getting Ben. Charlotte and Daniel seem like they just want to do their work. Although I am with Ed, why would you want an anthroplogist there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I agree that it was strange that Charlotte didn&#8217;t mention the spy. I assume she (or Locke) told Syaid about it and Sayid had said it would be best if he could get to the boat and see what they are up to. Maybe she didn&#8217;t want lapidus to know too much. It&#8217;s funny how only Miles seems hell bent on getting Ben. Charlotte and Daniel seem like they just want to do their work. Although I am with Ed, why would you want an anthroplogist there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t know that the freightor people are Widemore yet - but I suspect they are (hence the Penny pic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t know that the freightor people are Widemore yet &#8211; but I suspect they are (hence the Penny pic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost: The Economist :: OB1og</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost: The Economist :: OB1og</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2008/02/lost-the-economist-43/#comment-2656</guid>
		<description>[...] the new comments are, of course, over on The Ed Zone post. Tags: Hanso Foundation, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the new comments are, of course, over on The Ed Zone post. Tags: Hanso Foundation, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
