<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tangled Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/</link>
	<description>What Goes On In Your Ed?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>One more thing - I don&#039;t think the Marvel association with bad third movies is entirely a coincidence. I think Marvel is almost too intergrated into the creative process with their filmed properties - to their own detriment. It was Marvel that forced Venom upon Raimi and I think that decision ultimately weighed down the film. The problem with this film is there is so much potential there for a great flick - the raw material is in place - it just suffers from some giant holes and also some major filler. 

&#039;Entertaining mess of a movie&#039; is as apt a description as I&#039;ve encountered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing &#8211; I don&#8217;t think the Marvel association with bad third movies is entirely a coincidence. I think Marvel is almost too intergrated into the creative process with their filmed properties &#8211; to their own detriment. It was Marvel that forced Venom upon Raimi and I think that decision ultimately weighed down the film. The problem with this film is there is so much potential there for a great flick &#8211; the raw material is in place &#8211; it just suffers from some giant holes and also some major filler. </p>
<p>&#8216;Entertaining mess of a movie&#8217; is as apt a description as I&#8217;ve encountered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>I actually meant to give it 2 &amp; 1/2 Eberts. That will be remedied soon enough.

The funny thing was - when I started writing this, I meant for it simply to be a Blog post not a true review of the film - hence I simply focused on some of the things that really stood out or got stuck in my craw. After reading through, I realize it comes off sounding like a full-fledged review, thus I slapped the Ebert tag on the end.

I guess the critial quotient in me is my own symbiote. I&#039;ll have to go see if I can track down a kindly one-armed college professor to help me out of my jam.

Oh, and if you like J.K. Simmons, check out Oz. That&#039;ll change your tune. 

Kidding of course - he is always spot on as JJJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually meant to give it 2 &amp; 1/2 Eberts. That will be remedied soon enough.</p>
<p>The funny thing was &#8211; when I started writing this, I meant for it simply to be a Blog post not a true review of the film &#8211; hence I simply focused on some of the things that really stood out or got stuck in my craw. After reading through, I realize it comes off sounding like a full-fledged review, thus I slapped the Ebert tag on the end.</p>
<p>I guess the critial quotient in me is my own symbiote. I&#8217;ll have to go see if I can track down a kindly one-armed college professor to help me out of my jam.</p>
<p>Oh, and if you like J.K. Simmons, check out Oz. That&#8217;ll change your tune. </p>
<p>Kidding of course &#8211; he is always spot on as JJJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;d give it two Eberts. An entertaining mess of a film. Not as awful as any of the Star Wars prequels (the dialogue wasn&#039;t bad enough), but definitely inferior to the first two films.

This marks the third time in a row that a Marvel franchise has had a lackluster third entry (&lt;em&gt;Blade Trinity, X3&lt;/em&gt;).

And how can you not mention the incomparable J.K. Simmons? He&#039;s my favorite part of these movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;d give it two Eberts. An entertaining mess of a film. Not as awful as any of the Star Wars prequels (the dialogue wasn&#8217;t bad enough), but definitely inferior to the first two films.</p>
<p>This marks the third time in a row that a Marvel franchise has had a lackluster third entry (<em>Blade Trinity, X3</em>).</p>
<p>And how can you not mention the incomparable J.K. Simmons? He&#8217;s my favorite part of these movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggerboat</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggerboat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2007/05/tangled-web/#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Spider-Man 3...&lt;/strong&gt;

Twenty things I learned while watching Spider-man 3 (spoilers!):......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spider-Man 3&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Twenty things I learned while watching Spider-man 3 (spoilers!):&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
