<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost &#8211; &#8216;?&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/</link>
	<description>What Goes On In Your Ed?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFCC</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>JFCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny--the DVD television revolution has actually changed the game for me somewhat. Now that I can get something like &lt;em&gt;Lost&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Buffy&lt;/em&gt; on DVD, there&#039;s no impetus to make sure I watch it during the season (especially when you&#039;re not working in an office and don&#039;t have to worry about water cooler talk), watching a show becomes a scheduling issue just like everything else. What do I want to do, watch twenty episodes of a television series or read a few books to help inspire my writing? Usually I&#039;ll go with the book or even graphic novel before TV, it seems. 

But I&#039;m not knocking television--I admire ambitious scripted drama. It&#039;s the time commitment that daunts me.

Plus, to be honest, I&#039;m not the biggest fan of &quot;teasing&quot; shows--shows that have some big mystery that drags on and on, revealing little details here and there, often with a sense that everything is being made up ad hoc. It&#039;s like Wolverine&#039;s past in the comics--writers just kept making crap up and then other writers would come along and say that what the previous writers had written were &quot;implants&quot; and blah blah blah, with no cohesive vision.

And I wonder about &lt;em&gt;Lost&lt;/em&gt;...do the producers know exactly what&#039;s going on? Have they worked everything out beforehand? Or will this become like the &lt;em&gt;X-Files&lt;/em&gt;, where they keep adding new twists and material to the mythology, much of which ends up contradicting the previous stuff, until the whole thing becomes a mess? The problem with American television is that if a show has a successful first season, then it get a second season, even if the writers are unprepared for it, or if they more or less wrapped up the story in the first season. 

Thus, Jack Bauer has a number of very, very bad days--but all of which get wrapped up more or less in 24 hours. Kind of like John McClane (&quot;Oh man, I can&#039;t believe this. Another basement, another elevator. How can the same thing happen to the same guy twice?&quot;).

But I&#039;m willing to grant that maybe Abrams knows what he&#039;s doing and actually has a storyline mapped out. I still don&#039;t really like shows that continually tease you with a mystery. It drove me crazy on the &lt;em&gt;X-Files&lt;/em&gt; until I figured out they were making it up as they went along, like one of those round-robin storytelling games I played when I was a kid.

If you like &lt;em&gt;Lost&lt;/em&gt;, though, I&#039;m really surprised you haven&#039;t given &lt;em&gt;Battlestar Galactica&lt;/em&gt; a shot. People at my last job who loved &lt;em&gt;Lost&lt;/em&gt; were even more rabid about BSG, and it does a lot of that teasing too--trying to figure out who&#039;s a Cylon, what the Cylon&#039;s overall plan is, and so forth. That said, I do think the BSG folks have a cohesive vision, and I applaud their relative realism in the day-to-day depiction of life in space (supply problems, limited number of personnel and vehicles, silence in space, and so forth).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny&#8211;the DVD television revolution has actually changed the game for me somewhat. Now that I can get something like <em>Lost</em> or <em>Buffy</em> on DVD, there&#8217;s no impetus to make sure I watch it during the season (especially when you&#8217;re not working in an office and don&#8217;t have to worry about water cooler talk), watching a show becomes a scheduling issue just like everything else. What do I want to do, watch twenty episodes of a television series or read a few books to help inspire my writing? Usually I&#8217;ll go with the book or even graphic novel before TV, it seems. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not knocking television&#8211;I admire ambitious scripted drama. It&#8217;s the time commitment that daunts me.</p>
<p>Plus, to be honest, I&#8217;m not the biggest fan of &#8220;teasing&#8221; shows&#8211;shows that have some big mystery that drags on and on, revealing little details here and there, often with a sense that everything is being made up ad hoc. It&#8217;s like Wolverine&#8217;s past in the comics&#8211;writers just kept making crap up and then other writers would come along and say that what the previous writers had written were &#8220;implants&#8221; and blah blah blah, with no cohesive vision.</p>
<p>And I wonder about <em>Lost</em>&#8230;do the producers know exactly what&#8217;s going on? Have they worked everything out beforehand? Or will this become like the <em>X-Files</em>, where they keep adding new twists and material to the mythology, much of which ends up contradicting the previous stuff, until the whole thing becomes a mess? The problem with American television is that if a show has a successful first season, then it get a second season, even if the writers are unprepared for it, or if they more or less wrapped up the story in the first season. </p>
<p>Thus, Jack Bauer has a number of very, very bad days&#8211;but all of which get wrapped up more or less in 24 hours. Kind of like John McClane (&#8220;Oh man, I can&#8217;t believe this. Another basement, another elevator. How can the same thing happen to the same guy twice?&#8221;).</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m willing to grant that maybe Abrams knows what he&#8217;s doing and actually has a storyline mapped out. I still don&#8217;t really like shows that continually tease you with a mystery. It drove me crazy on the <em>X-Files</em> until I figured out they were making it up as they went along, like one of those round-robin storytelling games I played when I was a kid.</p>
<p>If you like <em>Lost</em>, though, I&#8217;m really surprised you haven&#8217;t given <em>Battlestar Galactica</em> a shot. People at my last job who loved <em>Lost</em> were even more rabid about BSG, and it does a lot of that teasing too&#8211;trying to figure out who&#8217;s a Cylon, what the Cylon&#8217;s overall plan is, and so forth. That said, I do think the BSG folks have a cohesive vision, and I applaud their relative realism in the day-to-day depiction of life in space (supply problems, limited number of personnel and vehicles, silence in space, and so forth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Tell those diehard fans to jump back in. They left just as things were getting interesting - with four strong eps in a row leading to some tantalyzing possibilities for next season.

As for the writing - the staff now includes Drew Goddard (Buffy, Angel), Paul Dini (the Batman animated series) and Jeph Loeb (comics writer, Smallville) - and they are kicking the mythology big-time.

All in all - this season has been more compelling to me than last season. The one knock I can hit it with is the frequent downtime (repeats) that broke some momentum, but that&#039;s a fault of the suits not the producers. Next season remedies that with a 7 episode mini season followed by a late season 15 episode run. Plus - DVD cures it all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell those diehard fans to jump back in. They left just as things were getting interesting &#8211; with four strong eps in a row leading to some tantalyzing possibilities for next season.</p>
<p>As for the writing &#8211; the staff now includes Drew Goddard (Buffy, Angel), Paul Dini (the Batman animated series) and Jeph Loeb (comics writer, Smallville) &#8211; and they are kicking the mythology big-time.</p>
<p>All in all &#8211; this season has been more compelling to me than last season. The one knock I can hit it with is the frequent downtime (repeats) that broke some momentum, but that&#8217;s a fault of the suits not the producers. Next season remedies that with a 7 episode mini season followed by a late season 15 episode run. Plus &#8211; DVD cures it all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFCC</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>JFCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 12:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Oh, I have no doubt it&#039;s good (though I do know some diehard fans of the first season who quit during the middle of the second, saying the writing had gone to pot). I just try to limit my television viewing in general and to read more books, given my chosen profession. But I&#039;m sure Kare and I will get around to it at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I have no doubt it&#8217;s good (though I do know some diehard fans of the first season who quit during the middle of the second, saying the writing had gone to pot). I just try to limit my television viewing in general and to read more books, given my chosen profession. But I&#8217;m sure Kare and I will get around to it at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 11:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s being made because geeks are gonna&#039; buy them. They&#039;re already all lathered up over at Ain&#039;t It Cool News at the notion of the &quot;Kate Crawling Through the Vents&quot; playset.

BTW  Jason - You really should pick up this show on DVD. You have no idea how sci-fi this show really is. That was illustrated quite a bit in last night&#039;s season finale. What&#039;s interesting is it has to be the most popular sci-fi show that has ever aired in prime-time (in terms of weekly ratings). The show has a dense, cryptc mythology that keeps you going - yet parses out just enough answers with minimal X-Files-esque Monster of the Week downtime. I think people came to the show thinking it was a dramatic Survivor and found themselves digging on the mystery. Now they&#039;re hooked. Grab that Season 1 set. By Episode III - Walkabout - I guarantee you&#039;ll be hooked. Season I hinted at the mysteries of this island and Season II was off the charts. X-Files fans. Sci-fi fans. Adventure fans. Da Vinci Code fans. This show has elements to thrill all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s being made because geeks are gonna&#8217; buy them. They&#8217;re already all lathered up over at Ain&#8217;t It Cool News at the notion of the &#8220;Kate Crawling Through the Vents&#8221; playset.</p>
<p>BTW  Jason &#8211; You really should pick up this show on DVD. You have no idea how sci-fi this show really is. That was illustrated quite a bit in last night&#8217;s season finale. What&#8217;s interesting is it has to be the most popular sci-fi show that has ever aired in prime-time (in terms of weekly ratings). The show has a dense, cryptc mythology that keeps you going &#8211; yet parses out just enough answers with minimal X-Files-esque Monster of the Week downtime. I think people came to the show thinking it was a dramatic Survivor and found themselves digging on the mystery. Now they&#8217;re hooked. Grab that Season 1 set. By Episode III &#8211; Walkabout &#8211; I guarantee you&#8217;ll be hooked. Season I hinted at the mysteries of this island and Season II was off the charts. X-Files fans. Sci-fi fans. Adventure fans. Da Vinci Code fans. This show has elements to thrill all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 04:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, that&#039;s no action figure, it&#039;s them things the geeks call &quot;busts.&quot; I guess that normally evokes an image of art and I guess you could argue that this is art as it looks pretty freakin real to me, so well done Toddy, but tell me why people need to buy this now? I mean, an action figure can be played with or set up in a basement-sized die-o-rama-lama-can, but the bust just sits there. It&#039;s art for geeks I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, that&#8217;s no action figure, it&#8217;s them things the geeks call &#8220;busts.&#8221; I guess that normally evokes an image of art and I guess you could argue that this is art as it looks pretty freakin real to me, so well done Toddy, but tell me why people need to buy this now? I mean, an action figure can be played with or set up in a basement-sized die-o-rama-lama-can, but the bust just sits there. It&#8217;s art for geeks I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFCC</title>
		<link>http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>JFCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 18:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edhumphries.com/2006/05/lost/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>McFarlane Toys has revealed the first Lost action figure:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://spawn.com/toys/movies/lost/charlie/images/lost_charlie_photo_02_dp.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://spawn.com/toys/movies/lost/charlie/images/lost_charlie_photo_02_dp.jpg&lt;/a&gt;

You too can own an &quot;action figure&quot; of a guy sitting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McFarlane Toys has revealed the first Lost action figure:<br />
<a href="http://spawn.com/toys/movies/lost/charlie/images/lost_charlie_photo_02_dp.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://spawn.com/toys/movies/lost/charlie/images/lost_charlie_photo_02_dp.jpg</a></p>
<p>You too can own an &#8220;action figure&#8221; of a guy sitting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
